Discover Important
ELIQUIS® (apixaban) Data
See select ELIQUIS randomized clinical trials (RCTs), real-world effectiveness and safety evidence (RWE), and economic outcomes data to help inform your formulary decisions.
ELIQUIS has been studied in 7 registrational RCTs, including 18,201 patients in ARISTOTLE and 5598 patients in AVERROES, and evaluated in several real-world effectiveness and safety analyses using various sources, such as Medicare and commercial claims data.1-4
ELIQUIS Clinical Outcomes
Find out more about select ELIQUIS registrational RCTs and real-world effectiveness and safety analyses.
ELIQUIS Economic Outcomes
Find out more about ELIQUIS real-world economic data from select US managed care and health system populations. Register or log in for immediate access to additional information.
Request More Information
If you would like to receive more information about ELIQUIS, submit a request for more information.
RWE and Overview of Select ELIQUIS Data Video
Dr. Steven Deitelzweig shares information about how RWE may provide additional information about the effectiveness and safety associated with a product, in addition to RCT information, to help inform clinical decisions.
References
- ELIQUIS® (apixaban) Package Insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, and Pfizer Inc, New York, NY.
- Lip GYH, Keshishian A, Li X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients: the ARISTOPHANES study. Stroke. 2018;49:2933-2944. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232
- Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):e003725. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003725
- Amin A, Keshishian A, Trocio J, et al. Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(9):1595-1604. doi:10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729