ELIQUIS Clinical Outcomes
ELIQUIS was studied in 7 registrational RCTs, including 18,201 patients in ARISTOTLE and 5598 patients in AVERROES. ELIQUIS has clinical information from registrational trials as well as real-world data that provide additional information using various sources, such as Medicare and commercial claims data.1-4 A few of these are included below. For more information, use the Request More Information form.
Download the study presentations below to learn more.
Stroke/SE Risk Reduction in NVAF
ARISTOTLE (18,201 patients)5
AVERROES (5598 patients)6
Treatment of VTE and Reduction of Risk of Recurrence Following Initial Treatment
AMPLIFY (5400 patients)7
AMPLIFY-EXT (1671 patients)8
NVAF=nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; RCT=randomized clinical trial; SE=systemic embolism; VTE=venous thromboembolism.
Download the study presentations below to learn more.
Select characteristics of randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence9-12
RANDOMIZED
CLINICAL TRIALS
- Prospective design with prespecified, well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, outcomes, and endpoints
- Patients are randomly assigned to treatment or comparator
- RCTs are designed to show causality (ie, efficacy and safety data)
REAL-WORLD
OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES
- Observational in nature and use data from routine clinical practice
- Patients are not randomized
- Can only evaluate association and therefore unable to determine causality
Select RWE in patients with NVAF
RWE should be reviewed in the context of RCT data. All RWE resources below also include data from the ARISTOTLE clinical trial.
ATHENS analysis
Published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine
A retrospective, observational real-world database analysis evaluating the outcomes of ELIQUIS compared to XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) in patients with NVAF.13
Ray et al analysis
Published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
The largest independently funded, retrospective, observational real-world database analysis evaluating the association of ELIQUIS vs XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) with major ischemic or hemorrhagic events in Medicare beneficiaries with NVAF (n=581,451).14
Fralick et al analysis
Published in the Annals of Internal Medicine
An independently funded, retrospective, observational real-world database analysis on the effectiveness and safety of ELIQUIS compared to XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) for patients with NVAF in routine practice.15
NVAF Hospital Readmissions analysis
Published in the Journal of Drug Assessment
A retrospective, observational real-world database analysis comparing stroke-related readmissions among hospitalized patients with NVAF treated with OACs in the US.16
Select RWE in patients with DVT/PE
RWE should be reviewed in the context of RCT data. All RWE resources below also include data from the AMPLIFY clinical trial.
Jin et al analysis
Published in Thrombosis Research
The largest independently funded, retrospective, observational real-world database analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of ELIQUIS vs XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients with DVT/PE (n=41,830).17
Dawwas et al analysis
Published in the Annals of Internal Medicine
An independently funded, retrospective cohort, real-world database analysis on the risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding with ELIQUIS compared with XARELTO® (rivaroxaban).18
VTE Hospital Readmissions analysis
Published in Hospital Practice
A retrospective real-world data analysis on the ED: hospital readmissions (Inpatient or ED) of patients treated with ELIQUIS or warfarin.19
DVT=deep vein thrombosis; ED=emergency department; NVAF=nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; OAC=oral anticoagulant; PE=pulmonary embolism; RCT=randomized clinical trial; RWE=real-world evidence; VTE=venous thromboembolism.
XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) is a registered trademark of Bayer Aktiengesellschaft.
References
- ELIQUIS® (apixaban) Package Insert. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, and Pfizer Inc, New York, NY.
- Lip GYH, Keshishian A, Li X, et al. Effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Stroke. 2018;49:2933-2944. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020232
- Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):e003725. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.003725
- Amin A, Keshishian A, Trocio J, et al. Risk of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding and associated costs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients who initiated apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in the United States Medicare population. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(9):1595-1604. doi:10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729
- Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, et al; for the ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981-992. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1107039
- Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al; for the AVERROES Steering Committee and Investigators. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(9):806-817. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1007432
- Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: results from the AMPLIFY trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2015;13:2187-2191. doi:10.1111/jth.13153
- Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al; for the AMPLIFY-EXT Investigators. Apixaban for the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):699-708. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1207541
- Hannan EL. Randomized clinical trials and observational studies: guidelines for assessing respective strengths and limitations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1(3):211-217. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.01.008
- Stanley K. Design of randomized controlled trials. Circulation. 2007;115(9):1164-1169. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594945
- Kovesdy CP, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Observational studies versus randomized controlled trials: avenues to causal inference in nephrology. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012;19(1):11-18. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2011.09.004
- Garrison LP Jr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, Marshall D, Mullins CD. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. Value Health. 2007;10(5):326-335. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00186.x
- Deitelzweig S, Kang A, Jiang J, et al. Clinical impact of switching or continuation of apixaban or rivaroxaban among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. J Clin Med. 2024;13(4):1073. doi:10.3390/jcm13041073
- Ray WA, Chung CP, Stein CM, et al. Association of rivaroxaban vs apixaban with major ischemic or hemorrhagic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2021;326(23):2395-2404. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.21222
- Fralick M, Colacci M, Schneeweiss S, Huybrechts KF, Lin KJ, Gagne JJ. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban compared with rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation in routine practice: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(7):463-473. doi:10.7326/M19-2522
- Deitelzweig S, Baker CL, Dhamane AD, et al. Comparison of readmissions among hospitalized nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants in the United States. J Drug Assess. 2020;9(1):87-96. doi:10.1080/21556660.2020.1750418
- Jin MC, Sussman ES, Feng AY, et al. Hemorrhage risk of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world venous thromboembolism patients. Thromb Res. 2021;204:126-133. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2021.06.015
- Dawwas GK, Leonard CE, Lewis JD, Cuker A. Risk for recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding with apixaban compared with rivaroxaban: an analysis of real-world data. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(1):20-28. doi:10.7326/M21-0717
- Deitelzweig S, Hlavacek P, Mardekian J, et al. Comparison of inpatient admission rates of patients treated with apixaban vs. warfarin for venous thromboembolism in the emergency department. Hosp Pract (1995). 2020;48(1):41-48. doi:10.1080/21548331.2020.1718925